Mission: Imperiled

Nicole Blais, CEO of Holyoke Chicopee Springfield Head Start

Nicole Blais was troubled when she clicked the link.

Forwarded to her by her the executive director of the Massachusetts Head Start Assoc., it led to an April 14 U.S. News & World Report article stating that the Trump administration was considering an FY 2026 budget that would zero out funding for Head Start.

Overall, the piece confirmed what Blais, CEO of Holyoke Chicopee Springfield (HCS) Head Start, already knew about the federal budget and this $12 billion line item — that a presidential budget is essentially a wish list, only Congress can allocate federal funding, and Head Start enjoys support on both sides of the aisle.

But she wasn’t in any mood to be complacent.

Indeed, within days, she had penned an op-ed for area media outlets, stating, “HCS Head Start is more than just a program; it is a lifeline that connects families to vital resources. The looming threats of federal funding cuts — especially to programs that safeguard the health and well-being of our children and families — is an issue affecting more than just those we serve.”

On May 2, said Blais, the president unveiled what’s known as a ‘skinny budget,’ which did not list Head Start as a program to be eliminated. But, as with that April 14 article, this latest report, while reassuring, is by no means final.

“That budget is just a proposal that’s sent to Congress. That was a good sign, but we’re still waiting to see the budget that Congress puts together before we exhale.”

“That budget is just a proposal that’s sent to Congress,” she said. “That was a good sign, but we’re still waiting to see the budget that Congress puts together before we exhale.”

There are many nonprofit managers and board members holding their collecting breath these days, including Andrew Morehouse, executive director of the Food Bank of Western Massachusetts, who said proposed cuts to SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program) funding and Medicaid would dramatically increase demand for the agency’s services at a time when demand is already soaring due to inflation and a softening jobs market.

“For the fiscal year October of 2023 to September 2024, we saw a 30% increase, and since then, we’ve seen a 10% increase,” he said, adding that this number will likely increase due to tariffs and other forms of pressure on consumers.

Meanwhile, several grants for area programs and initiatives have already been terminated, including:

• A $20 million grant from the Environmental Protection Agency to Springfield that was slated for home energy retrofits, air pollution monitoring, and de-leading of homes, an initiative involving several area nonprofits;

• A $1 million EPA grant to address asthma in Western Mass. through in-home environmental remediations, such as mold removal and improved ventilation, in Chicopee, Holyoke, and Springfield;

• A $50,000 National Endowment for the Arts (NEA) grant to MASSMoCA in support of Jeffrey Gibson’s “Power Full Because We’re Different” exhibition;

• A $400,000 funding package from the U.S. Department of Agriculture to the Food Bank for the fiscal year ending in August; and

• A $20,000 grant from the NEA to Amherst Cinema for its Bellwether series, which promotes “creative, thoughtful, and inventive approaches to non-fiction cinema,” according to a statement from the theater.

That list, and it is certainly just a partial list, shows that the cuts have come across the broad spectrum of nonprofits, agencies in categories ranging from the arts to public health to food security.

Common denominators, aside from language from the Trump administration stating that the programs in question fall outside the administration’s priorities, are actions to appeal the cuts while also looking for other ways to fund them — when possible.

Andrew Morehouse says looming cuts to SNAP benefits and Medicaid could greatly increase demand for services provided by the Food Bank of Western Massachusetts.

That’s not possible with a $20 million grant or even a $1 million grant, but it is with the NEA’s grant to the Amherst Cinema, for example, and also with the cut to the Food Bank’s budget, and both agencies are appealing to the public.

Meanwhile, at least one nonprofit, the YWCA of Western Massachusetts, is considering the launch of a capital campaign to sustain programs that are funded by federal grants that are mostly no longer available (more on this later). And many nonprofits are reaching out to area foundations, not only with appeals for funding, but for support with efforts to find ways to collaborate with other agencies to meet needs within the community and keep their agencies active and financially stable.

“People are reaching out, and not just with appeals for direct funding; we’ve been in conversations with our current grantees and others in the nonprofit ecosystem, and we’ve been having conversations about how else we can be of service in these challenging times,” said Denise Hurst, vice president of Community Impact and Partnerships with the Community Foundation of Western Massachusetts. “They’re asking about opportunities to partner with one another, share ideas, and collaborate in real time to navigate these difficult times.

“There’s still domestic violence going on, there’s still child abuse going on, there’s still sex trafficking going on, there’s still human trafficking going on, and there’s still stalking going on. And that means that the nonprofits in that arena that do that work are being stripped of the funding, and the survivors aren’t able to get the services they need.”

“We’re just four months into this new administration, and we’re really thinking about stabilization and sustainability of the nonprofit ecosystem,” she went on, adding that the region’s nonprofits not only meet critical needs, but they are an important pillar in the Western Mass. economy, providing not only jobs but critical services that benefit employers and their workforces.

For this issue, BusinessWest examines this time of challenge and high anxiety for nonprofits, what’s at stake, and how these agencies are responding.

Waiting to Exhale

As she talked about the plight of her agency, Liz Dineen, CEO of the YWCA of Western Massachusetts, shared information concerning grants from the Department of Justice for programs to assist those the agency serves.

They fall into various categories, such as transitional housing assistance grants for victims of domestic violence, dating violence, sexual assault, and stalking; grants to improve the criminal justice response program; the Sexual Assault Forensic Exam hiring and training program; and others, she said, adding that she and her staff continuously peruse the DOJ website, and, specifically, the Office of Violence Against Women, for notices of funding opportunities and apply to whatever is available.

Colleen Shanley-Loveless

“Private funding is not going to have the impact of some of these larger grants, and the state can’t make up for all of it.”

But starting in January and the start of the Trump administration, there has been very little available. Indeed, the DOJ recently terminated more than 360 victims’ services grants, which stripped hundreds of millions of dollars away from programs that promote public safety and provide victims and survivors with access to safety, security, and justice.

“Traditionally, at the beginning of February, there’s a bunch of new grants that are posted; they posted several new grants at the beginning of February, and then they pulled every one of them,” she explained. “There were no federal grants at all available for us to pursue.”

Recently, there were a few grants posted, one for Indian tribes and the other for rural areas, which meant this particular YWCA is ineligible for both, she went on, adding that the one program the agency could apply for had just 19 grants for the entire country.

“In the past, we might have had an opportunity to look at 30 to 35 grants; now we’re looking at one,” she said, adding that she’s found it difficult to even talk with anyone at the DOJ to get some direction on what’s happening — or not happening. “There’s a real dearth of opportunities out there right now.”

This reality prompted Dineen to consider a capital campaign so that the agency may continue to provide its services. A feasibility study is now underway, she noted, adding that the question isn’t whether there will be a campaign, but what the monetary goal should be.

“We’re trying to gauge what funders and foundations will be able to give us,” she said, acknowledging that, in most campaigns of this nature, funding is sought for capital projects such as a new building, but in this case, it’s to continue programming for which the agency can no longer secure grant funding.

“There’s still domestic violence going on, there’s still child abuse going on, there’s still sex trafficking going on, there’s still human trafficking going on, and there’s still stalking going on,” she said. “And that means that the nonprofits in that arena that do that work are being stripped of the funding, and the survivors aren’t able to get the services they need.”

What Dineen is experiencing — and her response, in terms of both action to keep programs running and strong words about what will happen if they are curtailed or eliminated — is being repeated across the region, at dozens of nonprofits.

Including Revitalize Community Development Corp. (CDC), where President and CEO Colleen Shanley-Loveless is responding to the termination of that $1 million grant to combat asthma as well as a $1.5 million stake in the EPA grant to Springfield that was terminated.

The former went to the state Department of Public Health, she said, adding that roughly $900,000 was left to be spent on the Healthy Homes program and initiatives that have been successful in bringing the rates of asthma down in this region.

“Indoor air quality in housing is impacted by gas stoves, older housing stock with leaky roofs, poor ventilation, etc.,” she said. “We piloted healthy homes work with Revitalize CDC and the city of Springfield. The work to address housing needs is critical to keep people healthy; these are proven interventions to help folks control asthma.”

Elaborating, she said funds have been terminated, or are in limbo, for several air-quality-related initiatives, including an EPA grant to the Hitchcock Center in Amherst and Springfield’s $20 million EPA Community Challenge grant, and the impact from these cuts could be devastating, with area health officials projecting increases in asthma hospitalizations and the cost of that care, as well as higher morbidity and mortality rates.

Jessica Collins

“We were being set up for a decade’s work to engage, educate, and inform people of how climate impacts health, but also to work with partners like the city of Springfield to literally change policy and infrastructure. And now, all of that will be paused.”

Shanley-Loveless said her agency has diverse funding streams and some public support, but nothing that can make up for the loss of millions of dollars in federal grants.

“Private funding is not going to have the impact of some of these larger grants, and the state can’t make up for all of it,” she explained. “And that’s the challenging part; $1.5 million is a large amount — if we apply to a foundation for $50,000, that’s a good amount, but it doesn’t come close to the amount and the impact of those federal grants.”

Clearing the Air — or Not

Jessica Collins, executive director of the Public Health Institute of Western Massachusetts, agreed, adding that, while nonprofits of all kinds are under duress, the Trump administration seems to be “piling on” when it comes to those involved with public health.

She has some theories about why, including lingering resentment over how the COVID crisis was handled. But the ‘why’ isn’t as important as the ‘what,’ she noted.

“The attack on climate change is really devastating,” said Collins, adding that her agency was to be a major subcontractor to Springfield to help the city carry out strategies related to that $20 million EPA grant, just one initiative in the broad realm of climate change her agency was slated to be involved in.

“We were being set up for a decade’s work to engage, educate, and inform people of how climate impacts health, but also to work with partners like the city of Springfield to literally change policy and infrastructure,” she said. “And now, all of that will be paused.”

There will be appeals to lawmakers to restore the funds and, in many cases, lawsuits to accomplish that same end, said Collins and others we spoke with, but nonprofits are bracing for the possibility, if not the probability, that they will have to move on without that funding.

And that has implications for individual nonprofits as they look to maintain staff and carry out missions, as well as their various partners in various initiatives.

“Last year, our budget was $4 million, but more than $1 million went out to 35 different organizations in subcontracts,” she explained. “So when we take a hit, everyone else kind of takes a hit as well because we’re seen as a convener and a lot of the funding we get is collaborative.”

And while shoes have already dropped for many nonprofits, others are bracing for the possibility that they might be impacted as well, while hoping they’re not — while at the same time acknowledging that hope is not a strategy.

That’s certainly the case at the Food Bank of Western Massachusetts, where the threat of cuts to SNAP benefits and Medicaid loom large over the agency and all those food pantries and survival centers that it supports.

“To the extent that those programs are cut, more people will turn to their local food pantry, meal site, and, ultimately, the Food Bank for more food,” said Morehouse, adding that a 20% cut in SNAP benefits has been proposed, which, if it becomes reality, would result in the loss of 19 million meals in Western Mass.

“That’s more than the Food Bank provides in a whole year, our entire inventory,” he went on, adding that there are nearly 200,000 people in the four counties of Western Mass. that receive SNAP benefits totaling $35 million a month. “That’s a lot of food, and it would, at the very least, result in a tremendous increase in demand for food assistance to make up for that loss. This would be a devastating blow.”

The same sentiment prevails at HCS Head Start, where Blais is optimistic that Head Start will remain in the federal budget, but not complacent given what’s at stake.

“At a time when the early-education world is rebounding from COVID and we’ve been so focused on providing access, this would be a ginormous step in the wrong direction,” she said, adding that Head Starts are “making noise” locally and nationally about how cuts to the agency would impact young people, families, and businesses still struggling to maintain workforces. “It’s like that ripple on a pond. Head Start reaches so many people; it’s not just families and children in the classroom.”

In the wake of cuts (and possible cuts), area nonprofit leaders are responding in many different ways — from hard looks at other sources of funding to educating the public and elected leaders alike on what’s at stake with these cuts, to looking at ways to collaborate to provide needed services.

Hurst told BusinessWest that the Community Foundation has received calls from nonprofits across a broad spectrum — including public health, the arts, environmental justice, and higher education — about cuts, what they mean, and how their broad impact can be mitigated.

“We’re doing a lot of deep listening, learning, and connecting them with resources,” she said. “We’re connecting them with other organizations so they can think about resource sharing and partnering with other organizations that are also trying to figure out next steps and strategy around culturing some of these funding losses as well as stabilizing internal operations.

“We’re there to listen, and thinking about ways to use that information that we’re gathering to influence and inform how we move forward,” Hurst went on, adding that the discussions are far more about strategies for meeting needs than plugging gaps in funding — because the gaps are too large to plug.

“We’re having discussions and conversations with donors about the importance of giving locally and regionally,” she said, “and how to be more strategic and intentional with their giving, both in the current and the long term.”